arnab221
11-05 09:57 AM
Folks ,
I was just pondering on why Madame Pelosi has not woken up from her slumber and acted on the letters that she is recieving . I can count 10 letters from my relatively short memory . Wonder when she will ACT and stop recieving and filing letters . JUST 54 days are left in 2007 . :eek:
I was just pondering on why Madame Pelosi has not woken up from her slumber and acted on the letters that she is recieving . I can count 10 letters from my relatively short memory . Wonder when she will ACT and stop recieving and filing letters . JUST 54 days are left in 2007 . :eek:
wallpaper Megan Fox#39;s quot;Toe Thumbsquot;
leoindiano
08-01 08:45 AM
The other thread got hijacked with other posts.
Please post approvals only if it is approved on or after august 1st, Thanks
Please post approvals only if it is approved on or after august 1st, Thanks
India_USA
07-28 08:18 AM
did the court rule on the AZ law yesterday? can't find it in the news........
I am hoping there will be some sort of action that will force federal govt to take up immigration reform.
I am hoping there will be some sort of action that will force federal govt to take up immigration reform.
2011 Megan Fox does good
dc2007
01-10 10:16 AM
Hi,
I am on H1B and still 4+ years are left on my new H1. I have got my I-140 EB2 cleared in July 07 and applied for I-485 in Aug. Got EAD in Oct.
My question is what is the better option out of the following to change employer:
1. To transfer H1B to new company with the same Job Title as was in previous H1B. I have good relation with my existing employer.
2. Or I can invoke AC21 and start working on EAD with new employer (after 180 days).
Questions:
Q1: If I want, can I come back to my existing employer on same old H1B (if thats still valid) ?
Q2: I frequently go to India (at-least one time in a year). So with EAD and AP, there might be more waiting/ filing each year etc.
Q3: Which is the better option for me - H1B or EAD ?
Thanks
I am on H1B and still 4+ years are left on my new H1. I have got my I-140 EB2 cleared in July 07 and applied for I-485 in Aug. Got EAD in Oct.
My question is what is the better option out of the following to change employer:
1. To transfer H1B to new company with the same Job Title as was in previous H1B. I have good relation with my existing employer.
2. Or I can invoke AC21 and start working on EAD with new employer (after 180 days).
Questions:
Q1: If I want, can I come back to my existing employer on same old H1B (if thats still valid) ?
Q2: I frequently go to India (at-least one time in a year). So with EAD and AP, there might be more waiting/ filing each year etc.
Q3: Which is the better option for me - H1B or EAD ?
Thanks
more...
tintya
08-31 04:25 PM
Hello,
Does anyone know if a H1B can be transferred from a University to a company? Has anyone gone through this process?
Does anyone know if a H1B can be transferred from a University to a company? Has anyone gone through this process?
Alcoraes
03-02 02:40 PM
Hi, My name is Alex and I am a Permanent Resident for 4 years. I got married but my wife just have a turist visa B-1. So, I already applyed for her filling I-130. What is the next step? Just wait or can i fill out I-765 because she needs to work?... One more question...She still have I-94 valid for 6 months, does she need to go back to Brazil?
Thanks...
Alex
Thanks...
Alex
more...
theshiningsun
11-05 04:53 PM
thx for the reply s416504.
attorneys, anything from you on this please?
attorneys, anything from you on this please?
2010 tattoo megan fox thumb toe.
vnsriv
03-25 02:12 PM
I had FP done way back in October 07..but there is no status change LUD on I-485..what to do??.:confused:..Do I take an appointment to talk to an officer or simply call USCIS ..
Was there any soft update?
Was there any soft update?
more...
deedee
12-16 12:07 AM
Hi there,
I am currently 29 yrs old. I have had my green card for 9 years now. However, I was arrest when i was in college at the age of 20, was convicted of a misdemeanor account of drug possession. Youth and stupidity some times does go hand in hand. :mad:
My question is this, should i apply for citizenship next year, GC expiring 2010. Or should I just extend GC. I have stay out of trouble ever since, not even a speeding ticket. I have turned my life around and currently a home owner. :rolleyes:
Does anyone know any case of a successful naturalization of a drug case that was none marijuana related? Any advice is greatly appreciated... thanks in advance!!;)
D
I am currently 29 yrs old. I have had my green card for 9 years now. However, I was arrest when i was in college at the age of 20, was convicted of a misdemeanor account of drug possession. Youth and stupidity some times does go hand in hand. :mad:
My question is this, should i apply for citizenship next year, GC expiring 2010. Or should I just extend GC. I have stay out of trouble ever since, not even a speeding ticket. I have turned my life around and currently a home owner. :rolleyes:
Does anyone know any case of a successful naturalization of a drug case that was none marijuana related? Any advice is greatly appreciated... thanks in advance!!;)
D
hair megan fox thumb toe. megan fox
prem_goel
05-19 12:35 PM
I applied H1-B for my wife who was not in US at the time of application. The H1-B was applied as an out-of-country option. This would mean that this will not be a change-of-status automatically from H-4 to H1B from 1st Oct as it usually happens. To get into H1-B status, she will have to get it stamped outside of US. It seems her application has been selected in the lottery as we received the receipt notice on May 8th.
My question is - As now she is in US - can I change the processing to say change-of-status from H4 to H1B instead? This would eliminate her going outside the US for stamping. Please respond. Thanks.
My question is - As now she is in US - can I change the processing to say change-of-status from H4 to H1B instead? This would eliminate her going outside the US for stamping. Please respond. Thanks.
more...
lonedesi
12-17 12:43 PM
My I-140 & I-485 applications had been transferred to VSC for receipting and later my I-485 was transferred back to TSC. But my I-40 has been pending at VSC for close to 6 months with no signs of any processing. VSC seems to be still processing Apr 06 applications while TSC has been processing I-140 under 6 months. Realistically my application should have stayed at TSC, but was transferred to VSC due to receipting delays and balance the workload. But now my application is stuck at VSC. For no fault of mine, my applications ended up in VSC. There is no signs of PP starting anytime soon. Can I lodge a complain to ombudsman in this regard? Will they be able to help me? Who do I contact and where can I find all the information to lodge a complaint?
hot Megan Fox Has Clubbed Thumbs
gc_chahiye
08-02 06:46 PM
this is increasing research grants for americans.
Nothing to do with the STEM related visa bills that we were interested in. Nothing to do with immigration, nothing to do with things IV folks are interested in.
Nothing to do with the STEM related visa bills that we were interested in. Nothing to do with immigration, nothing to do with things IV folks are interested in.
more...
house makeup megan fox thumb toes.
Macaca
07-31 05:23 PM
It's Time to End Or Reduce The Cloture Clog (http://rollcall.com/issues/53_15/guest/19599-1.html) By Robert Weiner and John Larmett, July 31 2007
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
Robert Weiner, president of Robert Weiner Associates Public Affairs, worked for 16 years in the House of Representatives and for six years in the Clinton White House. John Larmett, senior policy analyst at Robert Weiner Associates, was legislative assistant/press secretary to Rep. Jim McDermott (D-Wash.) and former Sen. Gaylord Nelson (D-Wis.).
The Senate's cloture rule defeats democracy. It lets public servants hide and obfuscate behind a parliamentary quirk never intended by the framers of the Constitution. It's time to end or significantly change the cloture rule, as was last done in 1975, and move to a true democracy so that the House and Senate equally represent the American people.
There are checks and balances, the only ones the Founding Fathers stated and intended: a presidential veto, which Congress can override with two-thirds, the only supermajority specified in the Constitution; the courts; and elections. No one ever foresaw parliamentary sleight of hand as a block of the will of the majority. If Congress wants to restore Americans' confidence in its work from the current all-time lows, it needs to allow the system to work as common sense, the Constitution and the framers dictate.
During the April-May 2005 "crisis" on judicial nominations, the "Gang of 14," seven Democratic and seven Republican Senators, agreed to oppose the constitutional or "nuclear" option and to oppose filibusters of judicial nominations except in "extraordinary circumstances." However, the Senate has failed to cut off debate on other issues 57 times since then, making clear that the system has failed.
Democrats are right to scream Republican "obstructionism," but Republicans, when they were in the majority, also were right to scream Democratic obstructionism. Both sides use and abuse the rule when they are in the minority to create some supermajority fantasy the public will not understand - and then blame the other side for not getting a legislative agenda accomplished.
In last year's campaigns, House Democrats promised to change the way Congress does business - and do it within the first 100 hours they were in session. With a majority of 30-60 votes, but no supermajority requirement, the House passed its entire agenda. Despite majority support, hindered by the supermajority "cloture," the Senate has struggled all year just to pass a few bills. The American people get the feeling the Senate is a train that never quite leaves the station.
The slow train continued July 17-18 when Republicans scuttled a Democratic proposal ordering troop withdrawals from Iraq in a showdown capping an all-night debate. The 52-47 vote fell short of the 60 votes needed to invoke cloture, the 27th time this year alone that body has been unable to proceed on significant pieces of legislation. In the previous Congress (controlled by Republicans), Democrats were successful 34 times in blocking Republican legislation. Cloture has become the third rail of Congressional politics. It's time for the train to move on a different track.
Everyone has been properly complaining about obstructionism, but no one has said anything about changing the Senate rule on cloture. Since Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) is talking about changing Senate rules to make it easier to restrict amendments on the floor, then why shouldn't the Senate also start the discussion about changing the cloture rule right now? It could be the difference in getting bills passed.
In early July, the minority's decision to filibuster the amendment by Sen. Jim Webb (D-Va.), which stated that men and women serving in the military deserved the same amount of time at home that they served overseas, died on a 56-41 failed cloture vote - a majority supporting it but the media saying it "failed."
In 1975, the Senate reduced the number of votes required for cloture from two-thirds to three-fifths, and it should change it again. If not an end outright, the best approach to guarantee the will of the majority, why not at least drop the requirement to 55 votes - necessitating just a little bit of extra consensus to end debate. Let the will of the American people, and of a majority of the Senate itself, be acted upon.
It's time to end the cloture clog, regardless of who's in charge.
tattoo Megan Fox Thumbs Pictures
ajju
11-13 09:33 PM
This looks similar to the PERM applied for labor... It would be faster for new applicants.. but old applicants could get stuck again... for years... and years... not due to visa.. but due to transformation...
more...
pictures Megan Fox#39;s thumb
WeShallOvercome
06-20 08:36 PM
Desi employer is not paying for the PTO that I used about 4 months ago. since I'm leaving them in about 2 weeks, they've been delaying this and not paid my PTO. I sent 200+ emails to them.,
I have emails from Employee rerlations managers of the company confirming my available hours and telling me that I would be paid. then endless chains of emails....
I intend to take them to court over this issue. Just wondering if emails in this regard would be sufficient proof of my eligibility and their reluctance for paying my PTO. Is PTO treated same as salary?
I actually went on vacation after confirming with HR that I had PTO in my account. Even after coming back I got emaisl from them that I'll be paid..
Nothing yet after 4 months.
Any suggestions on how to take legal help on this. I've been workign for them for the last 4.5 years.
thanks
I have emails from Employee rerlations managers of the company confirming my available hours and telling me that I would be paid. then endless chains of emails....
I intend to take them to court over this issue. Just wondering if emails in this regard would be sufficient proof of my eligibility and their reluctance for paying my PTO. Is PTO treated same as salary?
I actually went on vacation after confirming with HR that I had PTO in my account. Even after coming back I got emaisl from them that I'll be paid..
Nothing yet after 4 months.
Any suggestions on how to take legal help on this. I've been workign for them for the last 4.5 years.
thanks
dresses hot megan fox thumb disease.
Blog Feeds
01-21 08:30 AM
I am a strong supporter of Comprehensive Immigraton Reform (CIR). I have been on both sides of the fence. In the late 1970s and early 1980s, I was an attorney for the Immigration and Naturalization Service. I spent a couple of years representing the government in deportation proceedings, often conducted in Federal prisons. Are there people in the U.S. who should be deported? Absolutely! I have no regrets. But even while serving as an INS Attorney, I fully realized that the man that I deported on Friday afternoon would be back in the U.S., working at his job to feed...
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/01/cir-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-when-you-want-it.html)
More... (http://blogs.ilw.com/carlshusterman/2010/01/cir-you-cant-always-get-what-you-want-when-you-want-it.html)
more...
makeup megan fox thumb toe. megan fox
a_yaja
06-14 03:40 PM
Now that the I-485 gates have been opened, I would like to know what will happen to my spouse's H1B application pending before USCIS? Since I am planning on filing for I-485 for my spouse as well, will the H1B process make a difference? Or will the H1B approval cause any issues to the I-485 application?
Please help!
Please help!
girlfriend all Megan Fox#39;s toe thumbs
franklin
01-03 08:52 PM
Don't worry
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
My greencard was approved 4 months ago and I still don't have the receipts.
hairstyles Megan Fox Hates Her Thumbs
workhorse
04-03 11:09 PM
Current status L1A, exp 9/5/08 (family on L2)
Pending: I-140 EB1C, RD 3/5/07, still no news from Nebraska
Fact: My family members MUST travel to Europe this summer.
Fact: My extension I-129 for a renewed L1A must be submitted to USCIS no later than 6 weeks before 9/5/08.
Fact: I have L1A visa stamp and family have L2 visa stamps with expiration date 9/5/08 in our passports
Question:
How late is the latest my family members can enter US without encountering trouble at the border?
They need to be present in the US to submit the I-539 (extension of stay), but can it be submitted AFTER my I-129 or MUST they be submitted at the same time as an absolute rule?
Please advise.
Pending: I-140 EB1C, RD 3/5/07, still no news from Nebraska
Fact: My family members MUST travel to Europe this summer.
Fact: My extension I-129 for a renewed L1A must be submitted to USCIS no later than 6 weeks before 9/5/08.
Fact: I have L1A visa stamp and family have L2 visa stamps with expiration date 9/5/08 in our passports
Question:
How late is the latest my family members can enter US without encountering trouble at the border?
They need to be present in the US to submit the I-539 (extension of stay), but can it be submitted AFTER my I-129 or MUST they be submitted at the same time as an absolute rule?
Please advise.
lordoftherings
06-16 12:21 PM
I came to US on L1(worked for 1 year) and then switched to F1 till getting my H1B on May 2005 (which is 2 years old). How many years(3 or 4) do I have left on H1? I mean will the 1 year L1 count towards the total six years allocated for H1B?
Thanks!
Thanks!
njdude26
08-09 04:28 PM
Im currently in my 8th year H1 extension. I will file for my 9th year extension ( 1yr extension) and get it stamped in December. Then I will be outside the country for a year and will come back in next december'07. At that time can i file an extension and get a 3 year extension since i have been out of the country for a year ? If my labor gets approved and 140 gets approved then i know i will be able to do it but if the labor is still stuck....
No comments:
Post a Comment